Wait, maybe the original spintax is z, and each of x, y, z has three synonyms. So x could be synonym1 | synonym2 | synonym3, same for y and z. Then the result would be a? No, that would be all synonyms together. But maybe they want each original word to be replaced by their three synonyms. So the original three options (x, y, z) each become three synonyms. So the total number of options would be 3 * 3 * 3 = 27? But that doesn't make sense for spintax. Wait, spintax is about having multiple options for each variable. Maybe the structure is the same, but each word is replaced by three options. So x becomes a e i }, but that's not correct because spintax variables are separated into their own groups. Hmm, I'm getting confused here.
Wait, maybe the user wants each original option in the spintax to be replaced by three synonyms. So for example, original is y, and each x, y, z has three synonyms, so the result becomes b? But that's combining all into one group, which may not be intended. Alternatively, the structure is preserved, but each original word is replaced by their three synonyms within the same group. So z2, but that's nine options in one group. Watch Simran Khan 18 Video For Free -- HiWEBxSERIES.com
Wait, the original input is z, which has three options. The user wants each word to have three synonyms. So each x, y, z would have three synonyms. So for x, we have three options, for y three, etc. Then the new spintax would have more options. Wait, but how does swapping work here? Maybe they want to replace each original word with three synonyms. So x becomes c, y becomes d, z becomes g, but how is that structured in spintax? Wait, maybe the original spintax is z, and